|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
bit of background on the author:
Bernice & Franck Leroy have been involved with chow chows for
the past 15 years. Whilst showing on a limited basis,
they have bred and owned "in Show" winners and championed
18 chow chows, amongst which 11 homebreds since 2002.
They have been privileged to count amongst their mentors some of
the chow chow world's, as well as some of dogdom's, greats
- attributing their understanding to this indepth and generous mentorship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
are a number of factors contributing to correct stilt (pendulum
movement) on an excellent Chow Chow,
and not all can be covered here. In an attempt to improve
understanding and therefore to improve the breed,
this article will present an unexpected angle and therefore,
hopefully, fresh perspective for many.
So let us step away and approach the Chow Chow from a different
angle
|
|
|
There
is international lament for loss of the Chow Chow’s unique
and millenniums old stilted/pendulum gait. This being a major
defining characteristic of our breed, it is a very serious matter.
Few can explain technically why the Chow Chow stilts, and equally
few have actually seen correct stilted/pendulum gait. If the greater
number of breeders cannot technically understand what exactly
brings about stilted/pendulum gait, how can they produce it, select
for it or educate judges? If the greater number of judges do not
technically understand or see correct stilted/pendulum gait, how
can they accurately reward it? Most are looking for a quick and
easy answer, they are ‘too busy’ to do in-depth research
– typical of our fast-paced instant gratification society.
Vague explanations such as the misleading half-truth ‘it
is because of the straighter stifle’ lead to atrocities
such as the 2008 apparently poorly researched program aired on
the BBC, supported by predominantly laymen, Animal Rights Activists
and, at least initially, inappropriately responded to by UK Kennel
Club. |
|
|
FRONT
As with the
stilted/pendulum rear gait, there is a growing voice of concern
amongst knowledgeable breeders, specialist and all-breeds judges
with regards to the prevalence of incorrect fronts on Chow Chows.
Is it just by chance that along with the loss of the true stilted
gait in the rear, we have incorrect fronts escalating? Could it
just be coincidence that elbow health statistics for the breed are
not good as incorrect fronts increase? Why do we say that the front
assembly will affect the rear movement? Movement of any dog depends
upon front and rear assemblies moving in sync with one another –
be it because of correct balance or compensating balance. The rare
Chow Chow with its front and rear assemblies, actual bones and correct
angulations all in excellent balance and correctly placed, will
also have that elusive free stilt along with a shorter stride. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illustration
1
Typical pendulum/stilted gait, shorter striding, free movement
of a square Chow Chow with excellent balance. |
Illustration
2
The correct front assembly |
|
|
BREED
STANDARDS
The breed standards around the world call for:
Proud, dignified bearing, upstanding dog of Arctic type. Neck
– strong, full, not short, set well on shoulders and slightly
arched, of sufficient length to carry the head proudly, well above
the top line when standing at attention. Shoulders muscular and
sloping. Elbow joints set well back along side the chest wall.
Forelegs perfectly straight. Length of upper arm never less than
length of shoulder blade. A narrow chest is a serious fault.
Let us first look at the correct front assembly. On a dog which
has very moderate angulations such as the Chow Chow, how would
one anatomically achieve proud carriage with head well above topline
when at attention, an upstanding dog with straight legs, a square
dog with
free movement?
Illustration 2 shows the correct front assembly.
Point of sternum (vertical solid line) definitely in front of
point of shoulder (vertical dotted line).
Length of upper arm never shorter than length of shoulderblade.
Shoulderblade layback of about 55-60° and a corresponding
55-60° lay forward of the upper arm, creating a 110-120°
overall front angulation. (angled dotted line)
(Solid horizontal line = topline)
|
|
|
Evaluation
hint:
When evaluating the free standing Chow whilst it is paying attention
to something, step to a comfortable side view. Do not focus on a
foot out of place, but on the entire dog – take note of the
way the Chow uses its skeleton to achieve for itself a naturally
comfortable balance of bodyweight. Then go ‘lay hands on’
the Chow to confirm visual evaluation.
The following major front assembly faults (no, these are not just
failings!) have a definite impact on correct, free striding, stilted
rear gait and should be selected against when breeding and in the
show ring:
The poorly placed front assembly (point of sternum behind point
of shoulder.) (Illustration 3, 4 and 5)
The short upper arm (Illustration 3 and 4)
The straight upper arm (Illustration 5)
The straight shoulder (Illustration 4)
(When evaluating a rough Chow Chow, one should never base a final
evaluation just on a visual assessment, as all of these are disguised
fairly well by coat and handler.)
IMPACT
OF INCORRECT FRONTS
Head carriage:
* When the front assembly is placed too far forward along the ribcage
or the upper arm is short, the set on of neck is affected, thus
head carriage is affected. The body compensates to balance the free
standing dog to carry its head ‘in front of ’ the body,
not on the shoulders, giving a ‘top heavy’ carriage.
With more angulation all around, these dogs can show some length
of neck, though carriage remains ‘in front of’ the dog.
(Illustrations 3 and 4)
* Combining a front too far forward and the short upper arm, as
is much too commonly observed, we have a dog with ‘little
neck’ and poor head carriage. (Illustration 3)
* With the straight shoulder, the head cannot be lifted above the
topline. Again, a ‘top-heavy’ appearance with the head
in front of the body.
(Illustration 4)
* The dog with the front too far forward, straight upper arm, but
of correct length and reasonable angulation will tend to carry the
head well on the shoulders. This dog is often rewarded/selected
for, as the prouder carriage impresses. Pleasing carriage standing
maybe, but in movement, this dog will manifest its faulty front.
(Illustration 5)
Elbows/Pasterns:
* Because of the way the body has to support much of its weight
(centre of gravity) – with a front assembly that is placed
too far forward as well as with the short upper arm and the straight
shoulder – more weight and stress is placed on elbows and
pasterns, both standing and in movement. The result is weaker/softer
pasterns (manifest both in ‘down on the pastern’ and
‘east-west’ standing) and one of the contributing factors
to poor elbow health due to additional strain added to the elbow
joints.
(Illustration 3, 4 and 5)
Free standing body:
* With the front assembly too far forward the body is elongated
– definitely not square.
(Illustrations 3, 4 and 5)
* The short upper arm contributes to the ‘higher in the rear’
impression.
(Illustration 3 and 4 – if the rear was moved more underneath
the dog, it would become more noticeable.)
* The straight shoulder markedly increases length of back.
(Illustration 4)
* On free standing, the dog with the front too far forward will
stand with its front feet either fairly close or very close together
– often with a marked ‘east-west’ stance. More
barrel ribbed and fat dogs with an incorrect front will have apparently
normal or even more width
between the legs. Upon hands-on examination, no forechest will be
emerging from between the front legs. On the longer coated rough,
much hair might be emerging from between the front legs, thus a
hands-on approach is essential.
(Illustrations 9, 10 and 11)
* The dog with the front too far forward, straight but correct length
of upper arm and reasonable angulation may look glamorous in carriage,
yet no forechest will be emerging from between the front legs and
it will be too long in body.
(Illustration 5 and 11)
* The dog with the combination of front too far forward and short
upper arm will most likely have soft pasterns. This will give the
impression of the front legs forming a ‘c’ in stead
of a straight line underneath the shoulders, when viewed from the
side. The over angulated dogs with these faults tend to stand ‘rocking
horse’ – the front forward to support the body and a
compensating rear stretched back.
(Illustration 3)
* The dog with front too far forward, short upper arm and straight
shoulder will tend to stand with feet underneath the chest and weak
pasterns to achieve a balance of body and head weight.
(Illustration 4) |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Illustration 3 |
Illustration 4 |
Illustration 5 |
|
|
Gait:
* With any one or a combination of these – the front assembly
too far forward, the short upper arm, the straight upper arm and
straight shoulder – the stride will be foreshortened markedly
in front (directly proportional to the extent of the fault). Combine
this with the called for angulation on the Chow Chow and this dog
will have definite restricted front movement (not free moving) and
in compensation it will take shorter strides in the rear but it
is seldom that this dog will be stilting correctly, if at all. At
a slow pace this Chow Chow will not be extending fully in the rear
(appear sickle hocked, to varying degrees), (Illustration 6)
or, on faster movement, the dog may extend more fully in the rear,
but would have to flip the front feet up (padding) – to compensate
in front.
(Illustration 7)
* Whilst head carriage goes forward and lower during movement on
a correct dog (Illustration 1), head carriage during movement on
Chow Chows with front issues, is too low (‘in front of the
dog’), worse so in combination of faults.
(Illustrations 6 and 7)
* Often the gait of any of these dogs is remarked upon as ‘it
looks like the rear wants to overtake the front’ – which
it probably does want to do!
* The space to move more freely underneath itself because of length
of body, makes it appear that this ‘longer bodied’ dog
of incorrect structural balance moves ‘better’ (that
is – easier) than its shorter bodied companion, however, that
definitely does not make the movement (or the Chow Chow) correct!
* Because of the compensation by nature, the angulations and bones
on front and rear assemblies of these Chows are most often in complete
imbalance. Although these dogs will have a short stride in the rear,
they are most likely not stilting correctly (not have the correct
pendulum movement) – due to incorrect angulations and compensation.
This is not correct free moving, full extension stilted gait. This
imbalance causes the dog to tire easily, and this cannot be an endurance
dog, which the Chow Chow historically should be. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Illustration
1a
Full extension front & rear,
short stride, free gait. |
Illustration
6a
Restricted front and
compensating rear movement |
Illustration
7a
Restricted and
compensating movement |
|
|
Much
coat often hides the extent and type of stifle movement of the restricted
rear stride which compensates for incorrect fronts.
(Illustrations 6 and 7).
This incorrect movement is rewarded, taught and selected for as
stilted gait, yet it is as serious a fault on a Chow Chow as the
Chow that obviously drives from the stifle (bicycling). |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Illustration
1
|
Illustration
6
|
Illustration
7
|
|
|
Note
hair disguising stifle involvement on all of these chow chows. |
|
|
|
|
|
ADJUSTING
OUR VIEWPOINT
Perhaps aiding in the promotion of these faults in the show ring
is the fact that our Chow Chows are traditionally presented three-quarters
head-on in the show ring. Whilst judges can step back and see a
profile view, they’d have to step away and change their complete
angle to see all dogs in comparison in profile. Should the judges
be automatically exposed to the side view as in most other breeds,
they will more often see the incorrect silhouettes and select for
more correct structure. The judges have the prerogative to demand
dogs presented for side view, as some have done.
Compare the same four dogs presented ¾ head on and then sideways.
Notice how much more defined incorrect front structure is, from
the side view. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Illustration
8 |
Illustration
9 |
Illustration
10 |
Illustration
11 |
|
|
Evaluation
hint – ¾ front view:
Notice how there is no forechest emerging from between the front
legs on Illustrations 9 – 11. Being able to explain why helps
one to establish understanding. Notice in Illustration 11 that the
shape of the front is more visible due to a shorter coat, in comparison
with much mane in
Illustrations 9 and 10. All three these dogs have the same ‘missing
forechest’. In evaluating real dogs for a given purpose, one
should always have hands on approach and feel underneath both a
short front mane and the long front mane. |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Illustration
12 |
Illustration
13 |
Illustration
14 |
Illustration
15 |
|
|
Evaluation
hint – side view:
As an aid in learning to ‘see through’ the carefully
presented coat, it would be useful to take a pencil and draw in
lines on Illustrations 12 - 15 where the bones of the 4 Chows are
– include the topline, length of upperarm and shoulderblade.
When evaluating the angulations one will
see how it affects body shape, front and head carriage. Remember
throughout any visual evaluation that one is viewing the outline
of a dog of which the coat is fairly long and upstanding. |
|
|
These
artist illustrations are only of rough Chow Chows, for – as
most exhibitors of smooth Chow Chows can testify – very often
a smooth will be penalised specifically for structural faults which
may well be overlooked on a rough, because of the lack of coat to
hide it. This only serves to elevate the structural quality of smooths
as they have to be better to compete on an even basis. Fair? No,
but most certainly to the benefit of those who then go on to use
those smooths of better structure, to bring improvement to their
breeding program.
The disturbing reality is that these faults are occurring very frequently,
and mostly in combination (Illustrations 13, 14 and 15), on too
many of our Chow Chows. Because these incorrect, compensating gaits
(Illustrations 6, 7) are misinterpreted, they are rewarded and even
toted as stilted gait whilst being selected for when breeding –
ingraining the problem in the breed to an unacceptable level. As
with any structural concern, if we continue breeding incorrect front
assemblies without correctly identifying them and recognizing their
impact, we then still attempt to achieve a square, upstanding Chow
with free stilting rear gait, we end up breeding compounded structural
issues that leave us with caricatures. |
|
|
|
|
|
OUR
RESPONSIBILITY
|
|
|
If
we are to improve the breed and win back our true stilted gait,
every Chow Chow breeder/judge needs to have a ‘hands on’
approach to evaluating Chow Chows and selecting puppies. We need
to train ourselves to ‘see through’ the glamorous
coats.
Serious breeders will undertake to work away from breeding (or
exhibiting) Chow Chows with the point of sternum behind the point
of shoulder, and responsible judges will undertake not to reward
these Chow Chows (where exhibited) very highly. This will ultimately
be to the benefit of the Chow Chow as a breed.
If breeders and judges work at regaining the correct overall skeletal
balance that is an absolute necessity on a square, functional
breed, such as the Chow Chow (Illustration 16), we will also stride
ahead to regain a high prevalence of that millenniums old, beautiful,
free, unique and energy efficient movement of our breed. |
 |
|
|
Illustration
16 |
|
|
Legend for illustrations:
Horizontal solid line – topline
Vertical solid line – point of sternum
Vertical dotted line – point of shoulder
Angled dotted line, front angulation – 110 - 120 degrees.
First appeared in
The
World of Chows in 2007 and 2008
ISBN 978-90-76717-29-6
www.bbpress.nl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
