Left: The author on assignment in Norway.
One problem that has come forward, is the Authorities of the Common Market wish to alter everything about the different breeds that they think is abnormal – or not as sound as they, themselves, think it should have been. Which means for instance, Cocker Spaniels might have ear problems, then breeders should try to breed Cockers with standing, not hanging, ears, to give a simple explanation to the problems. Of course Chows have also caught the eyes of the Authorities, and straight back legs and deep set eyes are their main targets in Chows. Some judges these days seems to just look at eyes or angles in back legs and forget about the rest of the Chow, although type, and type again, should be their main concern. If the type is not right, you cannot put up a Chow to win although it might have dry eyes and/or lots of angles in the back legs. If we lose type, we will lose the Chow, and the result will be a dog that hopefully still has a blue tongue, but apart from that, could be any Spitz breed, for instance a Finnish Spitz.
Picture in your Mind
I therefore think it is very important for the judges to have a “picture inside the head” of a Chow Chow who can be a sample for what we want a Chow to look like. For the judges in Norway I have used GB Ch. Ukwong King Solomon as a sample. Probably quite a few Chows would have been OK to use, but everyone in Norway know about “Solly”s wins. He has type, size and balance. And balance is utmost important: depth of body compared to length of legs, length of back, the arched neck, the tail set, strength of head and bone, all add to the overall balance of the Chow. The Chow should be well built, solid, but not overdone in any direction.
Photos provided by the author as examples of dogs that are very close to her ideal.
Left: Ch (Int/Nor) Perlrema Trikki Tom (Imp UK)
Right: BIS Ch (UK) Ukwong King Solomon
True Chow Chow gait is really a problem for most judges not used to Chows. You very often hear judges say:“This and this Chow really moves well”. Very often I feel that the movement of these special well moving Chows would have been more correct for a German Shepherd than for a Chow. The stilted gait where the action comes from the hip with little action in knee or hock is seldom seen these days, and I really feel the judges have to be very aware of this and do their best to help maintaining this unique characteristic of the breed.
I think the judges play a very important part when it comes to the future of a breed. What they put up in the ring to day, will most certainly be the mothers and the fathers of the Chows of tomorrow. Although Chow breeders know what they like and know what they are breeding for, Champions and winner titles are vital to get your studs used and your puppies sold. It is very important for breed clubs to keep close contact with the judges and inform them about things that need special attention in the ring. Of course there is the standard to be followed, but I cannot see any harm in the breed clubs helping the judge to fill the frame as correctly as possible. And the judge in his turn, should report back to the club and breeders if he finds problems that seem to be increasing.
In Norway today these items are according to the breed club, important for the judges to pay attention to:
* The balance of the Chow.
Quite a few of today’s Chows in Norway have too short legs compared to the length of the body – or too long bodies compared to the length of the legs. But if the body is too long compared to the length of the legs, the Chow would not be up to the size required in the standard. Worth mentioning is also the length of the ribcage, between the ribcage and the hindquarters, the loin should be no longer than 4 fingers wide, a short ribcage and a long loin is not a short coupled Chow. It is important to the judges to be aware of these problems and choose the well balanced Chow if they otherwise think two exhibits are equal.
*The Chow should be an active dog,
It is not right when the dog drags himself around the ring. The Chow has pride and dignity, you can not achieve this with a “come help me and die” type of Chow. Exhibitors some times excuse their Chow to me in the ring, and say they are sorry he or she is so lively. I do not think they should be sorry, they have a happy healthy lively Chow, what is wrong about that!
*The angles in the front and the length of the upper arm.
Quite a few Chows today seems to have lost the angles and length of the upper arm, thus they lose the lovely arched neck, the good fronts and as a consequence the head is carried between the shoulders and not on top of them.
There will always be points concerning the Chow judging that might be improved, but I feel as long as the judges, clubs and breeders keep in close contact and exchange views and keep a firm eye on the standard, we are on the right track to maintain and maybe improve our beautiful breed.
Trimming of the Coat
There is a strong tendency these days, although it might vary from country to country, to trim a Chow to make the ears look smaller, the neck longer, the tailset better and the legs longer. The exhibitors find that helping the nature a little makes their dog look more correct according to the standard, and some judges even get so used to this that they penalise Chows that look natural in the ring. I have heard it said in the ring that “sorry, your Chow would have won today if it had been properly trimmed” or“sorry, your Chow looks so profuse coated compared with the other Champions”.
I think it is very important that both exhibitors and judges start reading the following lines in our Chow Chow standard again “Any artificial shortening of the coat which alters the natural outline or expression should be penalised”. This is the last sentence in the part about coat. The standard is to be followed and respected. It is our guide to maintain our Chow Chow from Ch Chow VIII till today, and just remember the small changes that have been made, have been made for the soundness of the breed. When the standard says “any artificial shortening of the coat which alters the natural outline or expression should be penalised”, it is a long sentence that can be cut down to two words: No trimming!! Of course, the Chow should be clean, groomed and presented looking as beautiful as just a Chow can do, but it is not to be presented looking more like an oversized Pomeranian than a Chow. (Actually the standard says you should not trim the Pomeranian either!).
I feel from my judging experience the last years that trimming is getting more and more common in the Chow ring. In my opinion the judges must take most of the blame for the growth of this problem. Yes, it is a problem as it is against the Standard! The exhibitors will present their Chows the way they think the judges will want to see them. If you as an exhibitor have been told by a judge that your Chow would have won if it had been properly presented (trimmed), you will know exactely what to do before the next show. Please Chow judges, take a look at your Chow Chow standard and read the sentence again: “Any artificial shortening of the coat which alters the natural outline or expression should be penalised”, and let us get our beautiful breed back in the ring: The clean wellgroomed natural Chow Chow.
Some authors have given permission for these articles to be printed out for private free use internationally, both in national judges' training schemes and for private free education of individuals. However, all articles remain COPYRIGHT of the authors and no copies of these articles may be published in any way without written permission from the authors. For permission please contact the authors directly or please contact the webmaster.
the web, it will be appropriate to LINK to the articles which
originally appear on this website.
Acknowledgement of the articles' original appearance on this website is appropriate and appreciated.